Legal Opinion

Maurice R. Huff, Nancy Huff v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 26, 1993No. 92-15089PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

The Huffs, pro se plaintiffs, filed a seven count complaint against the IRS. Counts I-III are best characterized as challenges to the procedural validity of tax hens under 28 U.S.C. § 2410. Count TV most resembles a request for a refund pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). Counts V-VII seek damages for unauthorized disclosures of tax return information under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103 and 7431(a). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the IRS on all counts. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

In March, 1987, the IRS issued a Notice of Intention to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Davis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Lunsford v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. Nicklaus v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  4. Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. DEL ELMER ZACHAY v. MetzgerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1997

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API