Legal Opinion

Jeremiah Michael Castillo v. April Woodson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 29, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02116Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMIAH MICHAEL CASTILLO, Case No. 2:25-cv-02116-DAD-CSK PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 APRIL WOODSON, (ECF Nos. 1, 2) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Jeremiah Michael Castillo is representing himself in this action and seeks 18 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915.1

(ECF Nos. 1, 19 2.) For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Plaintiff’s IFP application be 20 denied, and the Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. 21 I. MOTION TO…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API