Legal Opinion

Gene David Clay v. Walter M. Riddle, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1976No. 75-2363PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*457ALBERT V. BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge:

In habeas corpus appellant, Gene David Clay, prayed vacation of and release from a conviction for driving an automobile while prohibited as an habitual offender to do so, a felony under the State law, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, §§ 46.1-387.2, -387.6 and -387.8. His petition alleged that at his trial critical incriminating evidence was admitted contrary to the rule of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Respondent-appellee Riddle, Superintendent of the penitentiary, denied illegality, explaining that while such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. MacUkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. State v. BlissSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  5. State v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. State v. AmorinHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. PreeceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Richard McCarty v. Captain HerdmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API