Legal Opinion

Cowern v. Norris

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1993No. 92-341PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiffs, Richard and Joyce Cowern and Marie York (the sellers), appeal from a decision of the Superior Court (Coffey, J.), finding that the financing contingency clause in a purchase and sale agreement between the parties was not satisfied and that the defendants, Donald and Donna Norris (the buyers), were therefore entitled to the return of their deposit. On appeal, the sellers argue that the financing contingency was satisfied when the buyers received bank approval for a mortgage in the amount stated in the purchase and sale agreement because the agreement did not contain an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Makris v. NolanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. Bruyere v. Jade Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Langdon v. SibleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  4. Mailloux v. DickeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. Welkind v. HallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J&C Properties v. Rayster RealtySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API