Legal Opinion

Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 26, 1976No. 21, Docket 74-2540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

537 F.2d 4

189 U.S.P.Q. 759, 189 U.S.P.Q. 769

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HUNTING WORLD, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 21, Docket 74-2540.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 18, 1975.

Decided Jan. 16, 1976.

Opinion on Limited Rehearing Feb. 26, 1976.

Richard H. Wels, New York City (Moss, Wels & Marcus, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Roy C. Hopgood, New York City (Paul H. Blaustein, and Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil, Blaustein & Lieberman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Before FRIENDLY, TIMBERS and GURFEIN,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. The W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., the W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Elliott v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Solid 21, Inc. v. Hublot of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API