Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Brabson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1998No. 1309-95Published

1DissentPrice, Judge

I dissent from the denial of appellee’s motion for rehearing. Because I previously joined the Court’s opinion on original submission, I write separately to explain my reasons for believing that we should grant appellee’s motion for rehearing.

In retrospect, I should have been shown (as Judge Mansfield was) as concurring only in the judgment. On original submission, the outcome of Brabson was clearly correct. That is, there were at least two good reasons for holding that the District Attorney was not collaterally estopped from relitigating the issue of probable cause for arrest, even though the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BrabsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Reynolds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  3. Ex Parte Yates, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. State v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Ex Parte Richards, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API