Legal Opinion
United States v. Stegmaier
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 6, 1975No. Crim. 75-177PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
The defendants are charged with offenses growing out of an alleged bank burglary. They have filed motions to suppress, asserting that physical evidence was improperly seized and that the taking of their statements violated constitutional rights. A three day hearing was held during which twelve witnesses testified and numerous exhibits were received in evidence. This opinion will constitute my findings of fact and conclusions as to the disposition of these motions.
Some time during the night of October 2-3, 1974, the First National Bank and Trust Company of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Robert Wade Brown, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Joseph Miha McShane A/K/A Joseph Molae MihaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Herbert Levi Ferguson v. F. C. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. FarrarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- United States v. Greene Berry MullensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. MiahDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.