Bussey v. Affleck
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLEY, J.
Defendants appeal from the judgment against them for the balance due on a promissory note. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we conclude that the trial court properly rejected defendants’ claim of usury and therefore affirm the judgment. Plaintiffs appeal from the post-judgment order for attorney’s fees and costs, which made virtually no allowance for any of the disbursements of plaintiffs’ counsel in connection with the case. In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that such disbursements are allowable as attorney’s fees to the prevailing party on a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Julius C. Henry, Cross-Appellees v. Glenn D. Webermeier and Garden Village, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Beneficial Standard Properties, Inc. v. ScharpsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp. v. Howard J. White, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Winston Square Homeowner's Ass'n v. Centex West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Arntz Contracting Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Lerner v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Davis v. KGO-T v. Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Ripley v. PappadopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.