Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. a & S Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 2, 1993No. Civ. A. HAR 93-241PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARGROVE, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & G”) has brought this action for - declaratory- judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 to construe the rights and legal relations arising from contracts of liability insurance issued to A & S by USF & G and Co-Defendants Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) and Hart-' ford- Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”). Jurisdiction is based soiely on the diversity of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Defendant A & S has filed a Motion-for Realignment of the Parties and to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Dawson v. Columbia Avenue Saving Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Alan Jones and Craig Lee McCrackenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Price v. MesserDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. A & S Manufacturing Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. A & S Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Mendez v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022