Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. A & S Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1995No. 94-1002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge BUTZNER wrote the opinion, in ■ which Judge RUSSELL and Judge MICHAEL joined.

OPINION

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:

United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF & G) appeals the district court’s order realigning the parties and dismissing this action for lack of diversity. USF & G contends that the court applied the incorrect standard in deciding whether realignment of the parties was appropriate. In the alternative, USF & G argues that even if the court used the correct standard, the court improperly applied it. Affirming, we conclude that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. C. Y. Thomason Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  5. Maryland Casualty Company v. W.R. Grace And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. A & S Manufacturing Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Covil Corporation v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
  3. Rawls v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API