United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. A & S Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge BUTZNER wrote the opinion, in ■ which Judge RUSSELL and Judge MICHAEL joined.
OPINION
BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF & G) appeals the district court’s order realigning the parties and dismissing this action for lack of diversity. USF & G contends that the court applied the incorrect standard in deciding whether realignment of the parties was appropriate. In the alternative, USF & G argues that even if the court used the correct standard, the court improperly applied it. Affirming, we conclude that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- C. Y. Thomason Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Maryland Casualty Company v. W.R. Grace And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company v. A & S Manufacturing Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Covil Corporation v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Rawls v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020