Legal Opinion

Diehm, Katie v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 6, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00830Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KATIE DIEHM, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 18-cv-830-wmc MESSERLI & KRAMER, P.A., Defendant. This case is set for a jury trial, commencing January 21, 2020. In advance of the final pretrial conference scheduled for January 7, 2020, the court issues the following opinion and order on the parties’ respective motions in limine (“MILs”). OPINION I. Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine A. MIL No. 1: barring defendant from testifying that it complied with Wisconsin or Minnesota rules of professional conduct or Federal Rule of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wendelyn Harvey v. Great Seneca Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Bock v. Pressler & Pressler, LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  3. Miller v. Upton, Cohen & SlamowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API