Legal Opinion
Miller v. Upton, Cohen & Slamowitz
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 5, 2009No. 1:01-mj-01126PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, DECISION AND ORDER AFTER BENCH TRIAL
MAUSKOPF, District Judge.
Plaintiff Arthur Miller’s claims against Defendant Upton, Cohen and Slamowitz (“UCS”) having been tried before this Court in a non-jury proceeding, and based on a preponderance of the evidence and on the arguments presented, this Court sets forth the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, 1 pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and finds that UCS is liable for violations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In February 2001,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Raul Avila, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Albert G. Rubin and Van Ru Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Bock v. Pressler & Pressler, LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Bock v. Pressler & Pressler, LLPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Carroll v. U.S. Equities Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Diehm, Katie v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.