Smith v. Continental Bank
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Frank and LaDonna Smith, appellees, filed an action against appellant Continental Bank for rescission of a contract for the purchase of a house. The action, which was tried to the superior court sitting without a jury, resulted in a judgment denying rescission but granting recovery for breach of contract. The bank filed a timely appeal, and the Smiths filed a cross-appeal. This court assumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
The evidence presented at trial was that in 1972 the bank agreed to finance a builder in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leigh v. SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Columbia Western Corp. v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Kubby v. Crescent SteelArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Hall v. DelvatArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Voight v. OttArizona Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walters v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Luana Savings Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building CentersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Reed v. HinderlandArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Carolina H. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Amended February 23, 2015 Luana Savings Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building CentersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.