Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Parrish

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1903No. 13,209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Pawnee district court; Charles E. Lob-dell, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J. :

A judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error for damages on account of the breach of an oral contract of marriage alleged to have been made in June, 1901. On the trial the jury returned special findings of fact, among which are the following :,“Q,. 13. Did defendant in February, 1901, make a contract with the plaintiff to marry her? A. Yes.”

“Q,. 15. If you answer question No. 13 in the affirmative, state when the marriage was to take place. A. In March, 1902.”
“Q. 18. Did plaintiff and defendant have a conversation. in June, 1901, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LeggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. RowanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  3. Odell v. WebendorferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. MacElree v. WolfersbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  5. Branner v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Vaughan v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Heirshberg v. SlaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Heirshberg v. SlaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API