United States v. Marion His Law, Also Known as Charlie Boy His Law
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Marion His Law challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to distributing and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The government argues the appeal should be dismissed because His Law agreed in the plea agreement to waive his right to appeal, or challenge via post-conviction writs of habeas corpus or co-ram nobis, the district court’s entry of judgment and imposition of sentence. We construe this as a promise on His Law’s part not to appeal his sentence. We have held that a promise made in a plea agreement is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Lershawn Vincent KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by30 opinions
- Aaron M. Deroo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Harry Lee MichelsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Lonny J. StreetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Dorian Dee StuttleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.