Legal Opinion

United States v. Marion His Law, Also Known as Charlie Boy His Law

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1996No. 95-4228PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Marion His Law challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to distributing and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The government argues the appeal should be dismissed because His Law agreed in the plea agreement to waive his right to appeal, or challenge via post-conviction writs of habeas corpus or co-ram nobis, the district court’s entry of judgment and imposition of sentence. We construe this as a promise on His Law’s part not to appeal his sentence. We have held that a promise made in a plea agreement is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Lershawn Vincent KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Aaron M. Deroo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Harry Lee MichelsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Lonny J. StreetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Dorian Dee StuttleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API