Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Washington

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 1, 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

The defendant was found guilty as a joint venturer on indictments charging her with an armed assault with intent to murder and assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, a knife. On appeal she argues that the evidence was insufficient to show that she had participated in the attack on the victim or that she had intended that the victim be murdered. The defendant also claims that her trial counsel was ineffective in representing her. We conclude that the evidence was insufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew that the principal possessed a knife and planned…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. CasaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HennesseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. MuneraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. GilliardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. YunggebauerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. DreyerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API