Legal Opinion

Giles v. Lasister

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided October 8, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00120Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PATRICK ANTWAIN GILES, : Plaintiff, : vs. : CIVIL ACTION 21-0120-KD-C ARNITA LASISTER, et al., : Defendants. : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Patrick Antwain Giles, who is proceeding pro se, filed a complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

together with an application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs. (Docs. 1, 5, PageID.1,18). His complaint and application were referred to the undersigned for appropriate action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(S).…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API