Legal Opinion

Dohm v. Township of Acme

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958No. Docket 47, 48, Calendar 47,615, 47,616PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

At tbe time of tbe occurrence resulting in these actions for damages the defendant maintained a 2-story frame building in tbe village of Acme, primarily for use as a township ball. Tbe second story was rented to a fraternal organization, and tbe township customarily granted to persons applying therefor tbe right to use tbe first floor for private purposes. Tbe township clerk was granted authority by the township board to make a charge for such use, tbe minimum being fixed at $3 with tbe right to increase that amount in tbe discretion of tbe clerk. Apparently tbe only limitation imposed was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foss v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bell v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Hodgins v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Little v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Collins v. Inhabitants of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wash. State Major League Baseball Stadium Pfd v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bofysil v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Munson v. County of MenomineeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Lykins v. Peoples Community HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
  5. Berkowski v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API