Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Halsted

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 14, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

The motion made to strike out the appearance of the widow of deceased in the pending probate proceeding raises the issue whether an agreement executed by her in the lifetime of deceased constitutes an effective release of her interests in the estate and so bars any action by her in the proceeding.

The proof establishes that deceased and his wife had lived separate and apart for seven years or more prior to the execution of the agreement in question. During that interval the wife was paid $250 per month. Shortly prior to the execution of the agreement here in controversy she sought…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Vallee v. ValleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Vallee v. ValleeNew York Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HalstedNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of HalstedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API