Legal Opinion

Vallee v. Vallee

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

The parties to this action are husband and wife, having intermarried on July 6, 1931. About twenty-one months *621later, on April 5, 1933, they entered into a separation agreement whereby, among other things, the husband became bound to pay the wife $100 a week for the rest of her natural life or until her remarriage. The wife agreed to accept such provision in lieu of all other obligations of the husband, which provisions, it was agreed, should continue even though the marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce obtained by either party against the other.

This action was instituted by the wife…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Wylde v. Northern Railroad Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Hungerford v. . HungerfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Dowling v. . HastingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Isquith v. IsquithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harges v. HargesNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In re the Estate of HalstedNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API