Legal Opinion

Bergmann v. Michigan State Transportation Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2011No. 10-1708, 10-1770PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.

The district court partially granted Dietrich Bergmann’s motion to enforce a decades-old consent decree concerning some real estate he owned in Detroit. In deciding which portions of the decree are enforceable, however, the court incorrectly looked to Michigan’s statute of limitations, rather than the doctrine of laches. We vacate and remand.

I

In 1979, Dietrich Bergmann bought land in Detroit from the Michigan State Transportation Commission. A decade later, he sued the Commission and the Michigan Department of Transportation (together, the “Department”) under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Junerous Cook v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Evoqua Water Techs. v. M.W. WatermarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. U.S. Oil Recovery Site Potentially Responsible Parties Grp. v. R.R. Comm'n of Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. McKeon Prods. v. Howard S. Leight & Assocs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  4. USA v. Volvo Powertrain CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Coffey v. BraddyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API