Legal Opinion

Union Trust Co. v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The appellant-mortgagor conveyed the mortgaged premises subject to the mortgage but did not require his grantee to assume payment of the mortgage debt, thus creating an equity in favor of the appellant-mortgagor similar to that of a surety, which equity the respondent-mortgagee was under a duty to respect. (Pain v. Packard, 13 Johns. 174; Remsen v. Beekman, 25 N. Y. 552; Murray v. Marshall, 94 id. 611; Gottschalk v. Jungmann, No.|l, 78 App. Div. 171; Colgrove v. Tallman, 67 N. Y. 95.) The defense, upon which the appellant relies, alleges in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Pain v. PackardNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  3. Remsen v. . BeekmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Wells v. . MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. The Black River Bank v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rochester Savings Bank v. Stoeltzen & Tapper, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Eastwood Apartments, Inc. v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API