Legal Opinion

Vandermyde v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 3, 1979No. 78-145PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and Joseph Kelso, a CTA driver, for damages from injuries sustained in a rear-end collision in which a bus driven by Kelso struck a car which in turn hit the truck driven by plaintiff. A jury returned a verdict of *100,000 in favor of plaintiff and judgment was entered on the verdict. Following denial of their post-trial motion, defendants appealed, contending that: (1) the opinion testimony of plaintiff’s expert witness was based on an improper and misleading hypothetical; (2) the trial court improperly restricted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Marut v. CostelloIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Caley v. ManickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Gordon v. Checker Taxi Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  5. Nowakowski v. Hoppe Tire Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Karsten v. McCrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Falkenthal v. Public Building CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Elliott v. KochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Solar Equity Corporation, Defendant-Counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. O'BRIEN v. Thomas Steel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API