Husband v. Wife
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
QUILLEN, Judge.
The plaintiff sues for an annulment of a marriage on the grounds of force, coercion and fraud. This opinion constitutes the Court’s decision and order in the matter after a contested hearing.
The Court finds that there is insufficient evidence to grant an annulment on the basis of force or coercion. It is apparent that this claim is strained and the plaintiff was not in fact forced to enter the marriage by threats.
In regard to the factual conflict of testimony on fraud, the Court generally accepts the testimony of the plaintiff husband. The Court finds that the plaintiff did…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Grano v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
- Anonymous v. AnonymousSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
- du Pont v. du PontSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- In Re GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Costello v. PorzeltNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Hill v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Wronald S.B. v. Irina P.B.Delaware Family Court · 2000
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.