Legal Opinion

Prioletti v. Bowman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 25, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkerritt, J.

The plaintiff, vendee in a contract for the purchase of personal property in a restaurant, has brought this action against defendant Maoris, vendor, and defendant Bowman, agent for the vendor, to recover $1,000 which plaintiff paid to said agent as a down payment on the purchase price.

Under this contract, dated June 16, 1948, the vendor agreed to sell and the vendee to purchase said personal property for $14,900, on condition that the vendor should obtain an assignment of a five-year lease of the premises, and on certain other conditions. From the evidence I find that the vendor failed to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cobb v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Hall v. . LauderdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Dahlstrom v. . GemunderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Matter of Byrne v. PaddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scaramuzzino v. LarkinUtica City Court · 1967
  2. Emmons v. McFaulCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
  3. Prioletti v. BowmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API