Legal Opinion

Scaramuzzino v. Larkin

Utica City Court

Decided October 3, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJaCk J. Danella, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs, the purchasers of real property, against the defendant, Eva Larkin, the seller of the property and against the defendant, Sexton Co., Inc., real estate broker, who negotiated the sale as *840agent of the seller. The purpose of the action was to recover the down payment of $300 which plaintiffs paid to the broker as part payment of the purchase price. The down payment was retained by the real estate broker.

Under the terms of the contract, the sale was made contingent upon the purchasers being able to secure an FHA-insured mortgage loan in the amount of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Beeman v. MayCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948
  3. Prioletti v. BowmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wyckoff v. O'Neil, New York County Courts1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API