Legal Opinion

Diaz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated April 16, 1997, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety.

It is well established that the New York City Transit Authority owes no duty to protect a person on its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Alleyne v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Harrell v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Oppenheim v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louis v. KnowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Besedina v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API