Legal Opinion
Besedina v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kerrigan, J.), entered March 27, 2009, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants New York City Transit Authority, Harmodio Cruz, and John Koort which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
*858Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“The New York City Transit Authority owes no duty to protect a person on its premises from assault by a third…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weiner v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Crosland v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rios v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Miller v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Alleyne v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beadell v. Eros Mgt. Reality, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024