Legal Opinion

Keene v. Zelman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 29, 2009No. 08-4004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Ohio Board of Education and Susan Zelman, Ohio Board of Education Superintendent and Director, appeal a district court order granting plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees under the fee-shifting provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”). 20 U.S.C. § 1415. We affirm. In doing so, we hold that no special circumstances militated against the attorney fee award, and the district court did not abuse its discretion.

I

The $81,093.62 fee award contested in this appeal stems from the settlement of a class action lawsuit filed by plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Bharat Patel, Alibaba Charchor, Inc. And Mukesh PatelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re Anna Marie Walter, Debtor. Jerry Pruzinsky v. Silvio Gianetti Gianetti Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Traverse Bay Area Intermediate School District v. Michigan Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. B.H. v. West Clermont Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. In re John Richards Homes Building Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  4. Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API