Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1943No. Appeal, 99PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal presents this question: Does a discharge of the defendant in a habeas corpus proceeding under the “two term” rule, established by section 3 of the Habeas Corpus Act of February 18, 1785, 2 Sm, L. 275, and re-enacted by section 54 of the Act of March 31, 1860, P. L. 427, 19 PS §781, prevent trial or is it a discharge from imprisonment only?

John Mitchell was arrested September 9, 1938, charged with robbery, held without bail, and seven days thereafter was indicted by the grand jury. On October 1, 1938, he was arraigned and plead “not guilty.” His case was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Clark v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  3. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People ex rel. Nagel v. HeiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Commonwealth v. ZecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Smith v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Hill v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API