Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Conwell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2009No. S-13336PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Bobbie Ann Hunter and Shaun Conwell are the parents of two boys. After their relationship ended, Conwell filed a complaint for custody. Hunter received the complaint but did not respond. Conwell filed an application for entry of default and requested default judgment. After a hearing at which Conwell was present and Hunter was not, the superior court granted Conwell sole legal and primary physical custody of the boys. Almost two years later, Hunter filed a pro se motion to modify custody. The superior court denied the motion without holding a hearing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ebertz v. EbertzAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Barrett v. AlguireAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Silvan v. AlcinaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Morino v. SwaymanAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mendel-Gleason v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bagby v. BagbyAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Abby D. v. Sue Y.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Co v. MatsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API