Legal Opinion
Visitation of C.L.H. v. G.L.H.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 23, 2009No. 32A01-0812-CV-597PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
B.L.H. ("Mother") appeals from the trial court's order awarding G.L.H. ("Grandfather") and B.J.H. ("Grandmother") (collectively "Grandparents") visitation of Mother's son, C.LH. Mother presents a single dispositive issue for our review, namely, whether the trial court abused its discre*321tion when it awarded Grandparents visitation with C.L.H.
We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Mother gave birth to C.L.H., out of wedlock, on October 7, 2001. C.L.H.'s father, TY. ("Father"), has not been substantially involved in C.L.H.'s life and does not provide child…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Visitation of CLHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009