Legal Opinion
In Re Visitation of CLH
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 23, 2009No. 32A01-0812-CV-597Published
1Opinion of the Court
908 N.E.2d 320 (2009)
In the Matter of the VISITATION OF C.L.H. B.L.H., Appellant-Respondent,
v.
G.L.H. and B.J.H., Appellees-Petitioners.
No. 32A01-0812-CV-597.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
June 23, 2009.
Kathleen M. Sweeney, Robert A. Schemes, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
B.L.H. ("Mother") appeals from the trial court's order awarding G.L.H. ("Grandfather") and B.J.H. ("Grandmother") (collectively "Grandparents") visitation of Mother's son, C.L.H. Mother presents a single dispositive issue for our review, namely, whether the trial court abused…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.