State v. Halley
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
On the trial of the ease, defendant contended that this matter had been submitted' twice to the grand jury of Polk County,' and no bill returned: In the cross-examination of the ' State's principal witness, defendant attempted to show that the witness had made differeht statements before the grand jury from what he was then making on the witness stand. The record; however, shows that the witness on the stand was testifying as to the names of two parties who were present at defendant’s house at the time they made the'search. It is the claim of defendant that the same witness had testified…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SheridanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- State v. BrandenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- State v. PatrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WerlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944