Legal Opinion
Phillips v. THE GOVERNOR & CO., ETC.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1935No. 7800PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff seeks, by this suit, a permanent injunction against defendant, restraining the latter from in any way advertising or conducting business under the name of “Hudson Bay Fur Company” or any colorable imitation thereof, or any similar name calculated to deceive the public and to create the impression that the defendant is in any manner identified or affiliated with plaintiff. Plaintiff also asked damages, but no evidence was introduced in support thereof. Upon trial in the court below, plaintiff prevailed, and from the decree defendant appealed.
Gharles II granted a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Standard Oil Co. of New Mexico, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Del Monte Special Food Co. v. California Packing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Barton v. Rex-Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Esso, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. DunnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Tillamook County Creamery Association v. Tillamook Cheese and Dairy AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.