Legal Opinion

Miller v. Abrahamson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1908No. Civ. No. 558PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Appeal by defendant upon the judgment-roll.

The ground upon which a reversal is urged is the alleged error of the court in overruling defendant’s general demurrer to the first count of the complaint. The pleading, instead of stating the facts constituting the cause of action based thereon, is in the common-law form of a declaration in indebitatus assumpsit, alleging “that defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $622.10, for money had and received by defendant to the use of the plaintiff and L. P. Laursen within two years last past.” Appellant contends that this form of pleading is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Abadie v. CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Freeborn v. GlazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. McDonald v. Pacific Debenture Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American-LaFrance Fire Engine Co. v. BaggeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API