Legal Opinion
Barnett v. SKF USA, INC.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 13, 2009No. 282 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, SKF USA, Inc. (“SKF”), appeals the order issued on October 31, 2007, by the Honorable Bernard A. Moore, Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County. 1 After careful review, we affirm.
¶ 2 Appellees, Lawrence J. Barnett, Christine Cookenback, James M. DeFeo and Madlin Laurent (“Appellees”), are all former salaried, non-union employees of the Philadelphia plant of SKF, which was part of the MRC Bearings Division (“the division”) located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. SKF maintained a written pension plan governed by the Employment Retirement Income Security…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pappas v. AsbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23915h John L. Kemmerer James H. Jordan, in No. 95-1071 v. Ici Americas Inc. John L. Kemmerer James H. Jordan v. Ici Americas Inc., in No. 95-1098Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hooven v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Reichelt v. Emhart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnett v. SKF USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Wilson v. County of Montgomery, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2011