Legal Opinion · Dissent

O'Day v. O'Day

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1927No. 25,935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

I dissent. While the money so deposited remained the property of the heir or legatee, yet under the statute such heir or legatee cannot obtain possession of the same without applying to the probate court in the manner prescribed in the statute. A creditor has not more power than has the owner of the fund. The money was deposited under the provisions of the statute and subject to the order of the probate court.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Day v. O'DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927