Legal Opinion

Stevens v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1950No. 31201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Respondents, as plaintiffs, brought this action against both the city of Seattle and Kang county to recover damages to real property caused by the invasion of surface waters. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs’ evidence, the trial court, sitting without a jury, sustained a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence interposed by the county and dismissed the case as to that defendant. The trial then proceeded with the city as sole defendant, and at the conclusion thereof the trial court rendered an oral decision in favor of the plaintiffs. The city’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Whiteside v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kuhr v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Michigan Millers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. SanstolWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cambro Co. v. SnookWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Coleman v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. Gorton v. Port of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Sortland v. SandwickWashington Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API