Sortland v. Sandwick
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
This is a rear-end collision case. Four cars are involved-; and we will designate the cars by the names of the drivers. Wayson is the lead car of the four, and he stopped behind other cars waiting at a traffic light; he is not involved in the litigation except as a witness. Sortland is the number two car, and he stopped behind Wayson. Swan is the number three car, and he stopped behind Sort-land. (This is the conclusion of the trial court, which was supported by substantial evidence, although the appellant Sandwick urges that Swan stopped because he hit Sort-land.) Sandwick is the number four…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Arnold v. SanstolWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Prentice Packing & Storage Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Wilson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lamphiear v. Skagit Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Holman v. CoieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Martin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969