Legal Opinion

Sortland v. Sandwick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1963No. 36900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is a rear-end collision case. Four cars are involved-; and we will designate the cars by the names of the drivers. Wayson is the lead car of the four, and he stopped behind other cars waiting at a traffic light; he is not involved in the litigation except as a witness. Sortland is the number two car, and he stopped behind Wayson. Swan is the number three car, and he stopped behind Sort-land. (This is the conclusion of the trial court, which was supported by substantial evidence, although the appellant Sandwick urges that Swan stopped because he hit Sort-land.) Sandwick is the number four…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Home Insurance v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Arnold v. SanstolWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Prentice Packing & Storage Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Wilson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lamphiear v. Skagit Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Holman v. CoieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Martin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API