Turner v. Duke University
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
I
Plaintiff brings forth two assignments of error. Plaintiff first contends that Judge Barnette erred in denying his pre-trial motion to strike the notice of depositions of Dr. Rudolph Schereer in Florida and Dr. Robert Havard in California and in failing to impose mandatory sanctions under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11 and Rule 26. Specifically, plaintiff contends: that Duke knew for months before trial of the existence of Dr. Havard, an alleged key witness, but waited until just prior to trial to notice Dr. Havard’s deposition; that Dr. Schereer was an “expert” and allowing his deposition…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Byrd v. Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Overcash v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Melton v. StammCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- H. McBride Realty, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Turner v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988