Legal Opinion

Turner v. Duke University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1988No. 8814SC191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

I

Plaintiff brings forth two assignments of error. Plaintiff first contends that Judge Barnette erred in denying his pre-trial motion to strike the notice of depositions of Dr. Rudolph Schereer in Florida and Dr. Robert Havard in California and in failing to impose mandatory sanctions under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11 and Rule 26. Specifically, plaintiff contends: that Duke knew for months before trial of the existence of Dr. Havard, an alleged key witness, but waited until just prior to trial to notice Dr. Havard’s deposition; that Dr. Schereer was an “expert” and allowing his deposition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Byrd v. Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Overcash v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Melton v. StammCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. H. McBride Realty, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Turner v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API