United States v. Quon Quon Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe Government appeals from a judgment of tbe United States Customs Court, First Division, C.D. 1908 (rebearing denied C.D. 1924), sustaining tbe protests of appellee, tbe Quon Quon Company, and bolding tbe imported merchandise, certain rattancore, woven articles,- to be dutiable as parts of furniture under paragraph 412 of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 rather than as baskets under paragraph 411 of tbe same act as classified by thé collector.
Tbe protests, consolidated herein, concern two articles, both consisting of woven rattancore, one of oblong shape…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benjamin Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Byrnes & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Krauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Thomsen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Brody v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Grk Canada, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.