Legal Opinion

Craig v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1941No. Civ. 12274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

This appeal is prosecuted from “all decrees, orders and the judgment of dismissal rendered against plaintiff and for defendants” in an action for damages for conspiracy to defraud.

In order to state the contentions of appellant, it will be .necessary to quote verbatim her so-called “statement of questions involved”, because of the involved and confused manner in which such contentions are stated in her brief, to wit:

“ (a) The trial court erred in refusing to overrule the ‘Joint General Demurrer ’ by all defendants.
“(b) The trial court erred by denying plaintiff’s certified cross-motion for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodard v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merlino v. West Coast Macaroni Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Starbird v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Hendricks v. OsmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Evarts v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Sousa v. Capital Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API