Legal Opinion

Talbott v. Fountas

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1984No. 84AP-148PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

Plaintiffs-appellees’ motion for an award of attorney fees for a frivolous appeal, pursuant to App. R. 23, is not well-taken.

A frivolous appeal under App. R. 23 is essentially one which presents no reasonable question for review. While an appeal which is brought from an order which is not final and appealable pursuant to R.C. 2505.02 is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, it is not frivolous within the provision of App. R. 23. When dismissal occurs for lack of a final appealable order, there has been no consideration of the merits of the case, and hence there is no basis for a…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Parks v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Taylor v. Franklin Boulevard Nursing Home, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Curran v. VincentOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Danis Montco Landfill Co. v. Jefferson Township Zoning CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Dobbins v. Kalson, 07ap-831 (2-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API