Dayton v. Mintzer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Kamsey county, refusing a new trial, after a trial before Wilkin, J., without a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Berry, J.1
This action is brought for the purpose of testing the validity of an administrator’s sale of real estate.
1. It appears that on November 25, 1865, the will of Lyman Dayton, deceased, was admitted to probate in Ramsey county, and the plaintiff appointed administrator, with the will annexed. On January 2, 1867, the probate judge made an order removing plaintiff from administration, and appointing Parker Paine in his place. From the order of *394removal and appointment the plaintiff attempted to appeal to the district court. By statute such appeal is required to be taken by filing appeal…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Malinowski v. MossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. Reclamation District No. 136California Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.