Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. United States
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 30, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00226Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I THOMAS FRANK SCHMIDT, Civil No. 25-00226 MWJS-KJM Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND vs. DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. INTRODUCTION On May 30, 2025, pro se Plaintiff Thomas Schmidt filed a complaint against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1). ECF No. 1. Schmidt also applied to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees or security. ECF No. 2. In considering such an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.