Legal Opinion
Kingsley v. Forsyth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 9, 1934No. 29,994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JULIUS J. OLSON, Justice.
When plaintiff rested defendants were granted leave to rest for the purpose of moving for a directed verdict. A directed verdict was ordered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her a new trial.
Shortly after noon on January 7, 1928, plaintiff found her husband, Frank A. Kingsley, dead behind the steering wheel of his car in the garage back of his residence in Minneapolis. One door of the garage was partly open. Plaintiff called a neighbor and also her husband’s office. Firemen with a pulmotor quickly appeared, also a doctor from the city hospital…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Beaulieu v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Hill v. Travelers InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Huntly v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Streipe v. Liberty Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allinger v. KellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Patrick v. Employers Mutual Liability Ins.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
- Gahn v. LearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sworski v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.