Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1933No. Nos. 24143 and 24144PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The relators maintain that they are entitled to be compensated on the basis of their average weekly wages as members of the volunteer fire department, and as baker and restaurant employe, respectively.

The respondent contends that the proper basis of compensation should be limited to the wages received by relators as volunteer firemen.

The real question presented, therefore, is: What is the proper basis of compensation for these injured relators?

The legislation enacted by the General Assembly under the constitutional sanction in creating a state insurance fund for the benefit of employes, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. County of Monterey v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Village of West Salem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. CareyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Millard County v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. City of SheldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Wilson v. City of Haines CityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. State Ex Rel. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Smith v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API