Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Bryl

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1991No. Cr. 910132, 910133PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

The defendant, Richard Bryl, appeals from criminal judgments in Ramsey County for driving while under the influence of alcohol and driving while under suspension. Prior to trial, Bryl moved for the suppression of all evidence which was obtained after he was stopped by police on January 2, 1991. This motion was denied. Bryl then entered a conditional plea of guilty to Driving Under the Influence and Driving Under Suspension, pursuant to Rule 11(a)(2), N.D.R.Crim.P. We affirm.

Richard Bryl was arrested in the early morning hours of January 2, 1991. The Lake Region Law Enforcement…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. RonngrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wibben v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moser v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. LangsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. City of Fargo v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. SlaterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Kaysville City v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API