Legal Opinion

Sandles v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 20, 1993No. 01-91-01453-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEDGES, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Anthony Wayne Sandies, guilty of robbery. After finding two enhancement paragraphs true, the trial court assessed his punishment at 35-years confinement. In two points of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erred in admitting an autopsy report and autopsy photographs. We affirm.

Appellant was tried with two co-defendants. All three defendants had been indicted for aggravated robbery.

At about 11:30 p.m. on February 18, 1990, five people were congregated outside the Tulson Supermarket at the corner of Holman and Burkett in the third ward…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. United States v. Oscar Ramos QuezadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Quinonez-Saa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Darrell Wayne Hilliard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API